Characterizing re-triage guidelines: A scoping review of states' rules and regulations

Authors

Conor T. Broderick, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
John D. Slocum, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Michael Visenio, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
David Jelke, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Joseph Albanese, Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield, IL.
Mary Beth Voights, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL.
Richard J. Fantus, Advocate Aurora HealthFollow
Evert A. Eriksson, Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Charleston, SC.
Sarah Lombardo, University of Utah School of Medicine, Section of Acute Care Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT.
Stephanie L. Bonne, Hackensack University Medical Center, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Hackensack, NJ.
George C. Velmahos, Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, And Surgical Critical Care, Boston, MA.
Elinore Kaufman, Perelman School of Medicine - University of Pennsylvania, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, And Emergency Surgery, Philadelphia, PA.
Robert C. Mackersie, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA.
Anne M. Stey, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: as013j@gmail.com.

Recommended Citation

Broderick CT, Slocum JD, Visenio M, et al. Characterizing re-triage guidelines: A scoping review of states' rules and regulations. Surgery. 2024;175(2):522-528. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.024

Affiliations

Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center

Abstract

Background:State guidelines for re-triage, or emergency inter-facility transfer, have never been characterized across the United States.

Methods: All 50 states' Department of Health and/or Trauma System websites were reviewed for publicly available re-triage guidelines within their rules and regulations. Communication was made via phone or email to state agencies or trauma advisory committees to obtain or confirm the absence of guidelines where public data was unavailable. Guideline criteria were abstracted and grouped into domains of Center for Disease Control Field Triage Criteria: pattern/anatomy of injury, vital signs, special populations, and mechanisms of injury. Re-triage criteria were summarized across states using median and interquartile ranges for continuous data and frequencies for categorical data. Demographic data of states with and without re-triage guidelines were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: Re-triage guidelines were identified for 22 of 50 states (44%). Common anatomy of injury criteria included head trauma (91% of states with guidelines), spinal cord injury (82%), chest injury (77%), and pelvic injury (73%). Common vital signs criteria included Glasgow Coma Score (91% of states) ranging from 8 to 14, systolic blood pressure (36%) ranging from 90 to 100 mm Hg, and respiratory rate (23%) with all using 10 respirations/minute. Common special populations criteria included mechanical ventilation (73% of states), age (68%) ranging from60 years, cardiac disease (59%), and pregnancy (55%). No significant demographic differences were found between states with versus without re-triage guidelines.

Conclusion: A minority of US states have re-triage guidelines. Characterizing existing criteria can inform future guideline development.

Document Type

Article

PubMed ID

38016901