Differences and disparities among self-referred and physician-referred populations undergoing coronary artery calcium scanning

Authors

Nathan Marzlin, Advocate Health - Midwest
Andrew Chapel, Advocate Health - Midwest
James Adefisoye, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Kritika Garg, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Viviana Zlochiver, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Sara Walczak, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Doreen Plautz, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Michael Peterson, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Lakshmi Muthukumar, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Daniel R. Harland, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Renuka Jain, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Steven Port, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow
Patrycja Galazka, Advocate Health - MidwestFollow

Recommended Citation

Marzlin N, Chapel A, Adefisoye J, et al. Differences and Disparities Among Self-Referred and Physician-Referred Populations Undergoing Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;17(2):e015712. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015712

Affiliations

Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke's Medical Centers

Abstract

Background:Coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC) is an important tool for identifying subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk stratification. Despite robust evidence and inclusion in current guidelines, CAC is considered investigational by some US insurance carriers and requires out-of-pocket expenses. CAC can be obtained via self-referral (SR) or physician referral (PR). We aimed to examine differences in patient, socioeconomic, and CAC characteristics between referral groups.

Methods:We evaluated demographic, medical history, and CAC results of consecutive patients with a CAC completed at one of multiple Wisconsin sites from March 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021. We separated patients into SR and PR groups. Through census data, we analyzed socioeconomic variables at the block level including race and ethnicity, median income, average household size, and high school completion in the areas where patients resided at the time of CAC.

Results:The final analysis included 19 726 patients: 13 835 (70.1%) PR and 5891 (29.9%) SR. Most patients in both groups were White (95.2% versus 95.1%), with the Black/African American population representing 2.7% (SR) and 2.3% (PR). The PR group had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. SR patients were more likely to have a score of 0 (41.2% versus 38.1%; P<0.001); PR patients had a higher prevalence of CAC >300 (16.8% versus 14.8%; P<0.001). SR patients were more likely to be women (55.1% versus 48.9%; P<0.001) and were found to live in higher income areas (19.5% versus 16.4%; P<0.001). Patients from low-income areas comprised the smallest proportion in both groups (7.5%).

Conclusions:Patients who obtain out-of-pocket CAC live predominantly in medium- and high-income areas, and patients from lower income locations are less likely to obtain CAC despite having more cardiovascular disease risk factors. Consideration should be made from a policy perspective to promote health equity and improve utilization of CAC testing among underrepresented groups.

Type

Article

PubMed ID

38377241