Procedural utility, reliability, and success of endovascular intervention for peripheral arterial disease utilizing transradial access
Recommended Citation
Khraisat A, Abood Z, Mewissen MW, et al. Procedural Utility, Reliability, and Success of Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease Utilizing Transradial Access. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103992
Abstract
Background: Transradial access (TRA) in coronary interventions is widely recognized for its reduced complication rates and improved patient outcomes. Its application in peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) is limited.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent PVI via TRA between November 2021 and November 2024 at a single center. The primary outcome was procedural success.
Results: A total of 137 patients (median age, 70 years; 51% men) with 213 lesions were included; smoking (94.2%) and hypertension (93.4%) were the most common comorbidities. Chronic total occlusions were present in 36.4% of cases. Access was predominantly obtained via the left radial artery (83.9%); the right radial artery was used in 7.2% of cases. Bilateral interventions were performed in 21.8% of cases. The success rate was 98.5%, with a 2.1% rate of periprocedural complications. TRA facilitated early ambulation (30-120 minutes) and a 96.5% same-day discharge rate.
Conclusions: TRA appears to be a viable alternative to femoral or brachial access for PVI, demonstrating reduced complication rates and enhanced patient outcomes and satisfaction in this series. A few tools are needed to perfect and facilitate this approach.
Type
Article
Affiliations
Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers