Preliminary evidence supporting a novel 10-Item clinical learning environment quick survey (CLEQS)

Affiliations

Director of Education, Academic Affairs, Interventional Cardiology Fellow, Manager, Graduate Medical Education Programs, Program Director for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Family Medicine Resident, Advocate Aurora Health, Designated Institutional Official, Vice President of Academic Affairs, and Vice President, Aurora University of Wisconsin Medical Group

Abstract

Background: The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a priority focus in medical education. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review's (CLER) recent addition of teaming and health care systems obligates educators to monitor these areas. Tools to evaluate the CLE would ideally be: (1) appropriate for all health care team members on a specific unit/project; (2) informed by contemporary learning environment frameworks; and (3) feasible/quick to complete. No existing CLE evaluation tool meets these criteria.

Objective: This report describes the creation and preliminary validity evidence for a Clinical Learning Environment Quick Survey (CLEQS).

Methods: Survey items were identified from the literature and other data sources, sorted into 1 of 4 learning environment domains (personal, social, organizational, material) and reviewed by multiple stakeholders and experts. Leaders from 6 interprofessional graduate medical education quality improvement/patient safety teams distributed this voluntary survey to their clinical team members (November 2019-mid-January 2021) using electronic or paper formats. Validity evidence for this instrument was based on the content, response process, internal structure, reliability, relations to other variables, and consequences.

Results: Two hundred one CLEQS responses were obtained, taking 1.5 minutes on average to complete with good reliability (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.83). The Cronbach alpha for each CE domain with the overall item ranged from 0.50 for personal to 0.79 for social. There were strong associations with other measures and clarity about improvement targets.

Conclusions: CLEQS meets the 3 criteria for evaluating CLEs. Reliability data supports its internal consistency, and initial validity evidence is promising.

Document Type

Article

PubMed ID

34434516


 

Share

COinS