•  
  •  
 

Publication Date

7-18-2023

Keywords

P value, statistics, confidence interval, effect size, clinical significance, research hypothesis, analysis

Abstract

If recent experiences shared among the biostatistician community are indicative of a sea change in research, then a most-welcome culture shift in dialogue surrounding the proper use and interpretation of the P value, which measures statistical probability, is underway. This editorial strives to offer guidance for researchers who would like to incorporate more comprehensive reporting in their research, namely, a broader discussion that goes beyond looking at the P value by itself and includes effect size estimates, confidence intervals, and clinical implications when interpreting quantitative results. Another evolving development in clinical research is the preferred language when referring to results that were close to, but did not reach, strictly defined “statistical significance.” While all of this may seem simple, the details and nuances can be complicated; working closely with a biostatistician when reporting and interpreting study results is advisable and encouraged.

COinS
 

Submitted

June 20th, 2023

Accepted

July 11th, 2023

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.