SHARE @ Advocate Health - Midwest - Scientific Day: Iterative Process for Improving Compliance With Synoptic Operative Reports in a Large Healthcare System
 

Affiliations

Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Aurora UW Medical Group

Abstract

Background/Significance:

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer implemented standards for synoptic operative reports, based on evidence-based guidelines, that highlight techniques critical to achieving optimal outcomes. Despite this standard, institutions struggle with compliance. Descriptions of successes would be instructional for the community. Our objective was to assess compliance with synoptic reporting across a large multi-state hospital system and describe our process of improvement.

Purpose:

To describe our experience of increasing compliance for an accepted operative report standard within a large, multi-institutional healthcare system.

Methods:

We developed a standardized "smart-phrase" to be used system-wide. This phrase populates the synoptic table into an operative report. Training for surgeons was provided at each discipline’s cancer conferences. An iterative approach was employed, with monthly compliance reports sent to core leaders in surgical oncology. Non-compliant surgeons received targeted follow-up and education via email.

Results:

Initial compliance with synoptic reporting was sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx): 96% (107/112), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND): 75% (9/12), wide excision melanoma (WLE): 54% (7/13) and colon resection: 51% (18/35). Only SLNBx met the >=80% compliance. At nine months, compliance improved in all procedures: SLNBx: 96% (129/135), ALND: 91% (10/11), WLE 86% (12/14), Colon Resection: 81% (22/27).

Conclusion:

Monthly quality reports and targeted follow-ups improved compliance for three procedures. Challenges persist in refining accurate automatic reports and the diversity and quantity of surgical subspecialty providers within a large multi-institutional healthcare organization. Further interventions are planned for specific service lines to address these barriers.

Presentation Notes

Presented at Scientific Day; May 21, 2025; Park Ridge, IL.

Full Text of Presentation

wf_yes

Document Type

Poster


 

Open Access

Available to all.

Share

COinS
 
May 21st, 11:41 AM May 21st, 1:15 PM

Iterative Process for Improving Compliance With Synoptic Operative Reports in a Large Healthcare System

Background/Significance:

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer implemented standards for synoptic operative reports, based on evidence-based guidelines, that highlight techniques critical to achieving optimal outcomes. Despite this standard, institutions struggle with compliance. Descriptions of successes would be instructional for the community. Our objective was to assess compliance with synoptic reporting across a large multi-state hospital system and describe our process of improvement.

Purpose:

To describe our experience of increasing compliance for an accepted operative report standard within a large, multi-institutional healthcare system.

Methods:

We developed a standardized "smart-phrase" to be used system-wide. This phrase populates the synoptic table into an operative report. Training for surgeons was provided at each discipline’s cancer conferences. An iterative approach was employed, with monthly compliance reports sent to core leaders in surgical oncology. Non-compliant surgeons received targeted follow-up and education via email.

Results:

Initial compliance with synoptic reporting was sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx): 96% (107/112), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND): 75% (9/12), wide excision melanoma (WLE): 54% (7/13) and colon resection: 51% (18/35). Only SLNBx met the >=80% compliance. At nine months, compliance improved in all procedures: SLNBx: 96% (129/135), ALND: 91% (10/11), WLE 86% (12/14), Colon Resection: 81% (22/27).

Conclusion:

Monthly quality reports and targeted follow-ups improved compliance for three procedures. Challenges persist in refining accurate automatic reports and the diversity and quantity of surgical subspecialty providers within a large multi-institutional healthcare organization. Further interventions are planned for specific service lines to address these barriers.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.